My post apparently was marked as spam (see
https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JSL-JMP-17-OAuth-apparently-generates-invalid-request/m-p/836077#M101326).
Why is that the case, and what should I do to avoid being flagged as spam?
Kind regards
Frank
Link to post:
(JSL / JMP 17: OAuth apparently generates invalid request)
by inreoh
https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JSL-JMP-17-OAuth-apparently-generates-invalid-request/m-p/836077#M101326
I'm currently trying to obtain an OAuth2 token to authenticate for an external service (Snowflake database), but I'm running into some problems with this. According to the documentation, this is supposed to work: oauth2_token = New OAuth2 Token( User( username ), Password( password), Client ID( client_id ), Client Secret( client_secret ), Token URL( "http://localhost:8008" ), Grant Type("password"), Scope("session:role-any") ); However, whenever I run this, I get back an HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request INVALID_REQUEST:INVALID_REQUESTDESCRIPTION To debug this, I started a locally running HTTP echo server and sent requests from Python (working code, verified with real OAuth2 server) and JMP, and I got back this: Python 127.0.0.1 - - [05/Feb/2025 13:36:00] "POST / HTTP/1.1" 200 - Host: localhost:8008 User-Agent: python-requests/2.32.3 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate Accept: */* Connection: keep-alive Content-Length: 91 Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Authorization: Basic <redacted>= grant_type=password&username=<redacted>&password=<redacted>&scope=session%3Arole-any JMP 17 127.0.0.1 - - [05/Feb/2025 13:36:56] "POST / HTTP/1.1" 200 - Host: localhost:8008 User-Agent: libcurl-agent/1.0 (Windows NT 10.0.22631;x64) Accept: */* Content-Length: 102 Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded client_id=<redacted>&redirect_uri=&response_type=token&scope=&state=<redacted> As you can see, there's no Authorization header, and also, most of the request parameters (grant type, username, password, scope) are missing. To me, it looks like JMP generates a bogus request, and therefore, the communication with the server fails. Is this assumption correct? Or am I doing something wrong? Any help would be highly appreciated. Kind regards Frank
This message has 0 replies
