nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

766800_en-US

liliconcom

Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

I have a reliability dataset where some of the readouts did not have any fails. Do I merge these readouts with the ones that have fails or include them separately?

Please refer to Setup1 Vs Setup2 in the snippet below [JMP file attached too]. Weibull alpha and beta parameters between Setup1 and Setup2 are drastically different. To me, setup2 seems reasonable since it includes complete information.

Reliability Analysis

Re: Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

@JerryFish , @DonMcCormack Could you offer any insight on this? Thank you

Re: Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

This issue has been resolved. Setup1 Time_low entries need to be corrected. For e.g. Row4 Time_low entry should be 700, not 200.

Comments

There are no comments yet