Cree columnas de forma iterativa que contengan fórmulas.Me gustaría recorrer las columnas que tienen límites de especificaciones y realizar análisis en función de ellas.
New Column("WM Minus Target", Numeric, "Continuous", Format("Best", 10), Formula(:WN - (:WN << get property("Spec Limits"))["Target"]), Set Selected);El script que se encuentra aquí se acerca a lo que quiero.
Resuelto: cuando una especificación está activada, ¿cómo escribo un script cuando quiero escribir un nombre de error? - Comunidad de usuarios de JMP
¿Me pregunto cómo conseguir la fórmula más complicada?
Gracias
llave inglesa
Automatización y secuencias de comandosRe: Crear columnas que contengan fórmulas de forma iterativa.Esta es una forma. Podría ser más elegante con una matriz asociativa en lugar de 2 listas, pero usar 2 listas me resulta más fácil de entender:
Names Default To Here( 1 );
dt = Open( "$SAMPLE_DATA/Semiconductor Capability.jmp" );
lstCols = {};
lstTargets = {};
//get cols with targets
For Each( {i}, 1 :: N Col( dt ),
t = .;
Try( t = (Column( i ) << Get Property( "Spec Limits" ))["Target"], );
If( !Is Missing( t ),
Insert Into( lstCols, i );
Insert Into( lstTargets, t);
);
);
//make formulas
For Each( {i, j}, lstCols,
//i = 5; j = 1;
dt << New Column( char(Column Name( i )) || " Minus Target",
Numeric,
"Continuous",
Format( "Best", 10 ),
Formula( as column(Column( i )) - lstTargets[j] )
)
);
/*JMP STATISTICAL DISCOVERY LLC (“JMP”) PERMITS THE USE OF THIS COMPUTER SOFTWARE CODE (“CODE”) ON AN AS-IS BASIS AND AUTHORIZES YOU TO USE THE CODE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS LISTED HEREIN. BY USING THE CODE, YOU AGREE TO THESE TERMS. YOUR USE OF THE CODE IS AT YOUR OWN RISK. JMP MAKES NO REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NONINFRIGEMENT, AND TITLE, WITH RESPECT TO THE CODE.
You may use the Code solely as part of a software product you currently have licensed from JMP, JMP’s parent company SAS Institute Inc. (“SAS”), or one of JMP’s or SAS’s subsidiaries or authorized agents (the “Software”), and not for any other purpose. The Code is designed to add functionality to the Software but has not necessarily been tested. Accordingly, JMP makes no representation or warranty that the Code will operate error-free. JMP is under no obligation to maintain, support, or continue to distribute the Code.
Neither JMP nor its licensors shall be liable to you or any third-party for any general, special, direct, indirect, consequential, incidental, or other damages whatsoever arising out of or related to your use or inability to use the Code, even if JMP has been advised of the possibility of such damages. Except as otherwise provided above, the Code is governed by the same agreement that governs the Software. If you do not have an existing agreement with JMP or SAS governing the Software, you may not use the Code.
JMP and all other JMP Statistical Discovery LLC product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of JMP Statistical Discovery LLC in the USA and other countries. ® indicates USA registration. Other brand and product names are registered trademarks or trademarks of their respective companies.
*/
Re: Crear columnas que contengan fórmulas de forma iterativa.Y aquí hay otra manera
Names Default To Here( 1 );
dt =
// Open Data Table: semiconductor capability.jmp
// → Data Table( "semiconductor capability" )
Open( "$SAMPLE_DATA/semiconductor capability.jmp" );
colNames = dt << get column names( continuous, string );
For each( {col}, colNames,
Eval(
Eval Expr(
theTarget = (Column( Eval( col ) ) << get property( "Spec Limits" ))["Target"];
New Column( Expr( col ) || " Minus Target",
Numeric,
"Continuous",
Format( "Best", 10 ),
Formula( As Column( Eval( col ) ) - Expr( theTarget ) )
);
)
);
);Re: Crear columnas que contengan fórmulas de forma iterativa.El código funciona, pero cuando miro la fórmula en la columna resultante se ve así.
As Column( Column( i ) ) - lstTargets[j]
Re: Crear columnas que contengan fórmulas de forma iterativa.Parece interesante, aunque me da un error. Nombre sin resolver: theTarget en acceso o evaluación de 'theTarget', theTarget/*###*/
Re: Crear columnas que contengan fórmulas de forma iterativa.No utilizar Eval(Evalexpr()) no permite la expansión completa del código de la fórmula antes de la ejecución. Pruebe mi código modificado a continuación
Names Default To Here( 1 );
dt =
// Open Data Table: semiconductor capability.jmp
// → Data Table( "semiconductor capability" )
Open( "$SAMPLE_DATA/semiconductor capability.jmp" );
colNames = dt << get column names( continuous, string );
For Each( {xcol}, colNames,
col = xcol;
theTarget = (Column( Eval( col ) ) << get property( "Spec Limits" ))["Target"];
Eval(
Eval Expr(
New Column( col || " Minus Target",
Numeric,
"Continuous",
Format( "Best", 10 ),
Formula( As Column( Eval( col ) ) - Expr( theTarget ) )
)
)
);
);Re: Crear columnas que contengan fórmulas de forma iterativa.La solución Eval() de Jim también debería ser similar a cómo hacer que la fórmula se muestre correctamente en mi ejemplo.
Re: Crear columnas que contengan fórmulas de forma iterativa.Dependiendo de su análisis, puede agregar una nueva columna para cada medición o apilar su tabla primero y crear una sola columna nueva.
Agregar nuevas columnas para cada parámetro
Names Default To Here(1);
dt = Open("$SAMPLE_DATA/Semiconductor Capability.jmp");
cont_cols = dt << Get Column Names("Continuous", "String");
cols_created = {};
For Each({cont_col}, cont_cols,
specs = Column(dt, cont_col) << Get Property("Spec Limits");
If(Is Empty(specs), // skip columns without specs
Continue();
);
cur_target = Try(specs["Target"], .); // If target isn't set -> use 0 (could for example use USL - LSL?)
new_col = Eval(Substitute( // generally I use Eval(EvalExpr()) but in this case this makes expression more clear
Expr(dt << New Column(cont_col || " Minus Target", Numeric, Continuos, Formula(
_curcol_ - _targetval_
))),
Expr(_curcol_), Name Expr(AsColumn(dt, cont_col)),
Expr(_targetval_), cur_target
));
// new_col << Suppress Eval(1);
Insert Into(cols_created, new_col << get name);
);
y terminas con columnas como esta (el destino no se actualizará SI cambias la propiedad de la columna)

Apilado
Names Default To Here(1);
dt = Open("$SAMPLE_DATA/Semiconductor Capability.jmp");
cont_cols = dt << Get Column Names("Continuous", "String");
ml = dt << Manage Limits(Process Variables(Eval(cont_cols))); // in this case this will open very annoying "help" window due to inconsistencies
dt_limits = ml << Save to Tall Limits Table;
ml << close window;
dt_stack = dt << Stack(
columns(Eval(cont_cols)),
Source Label Column("Measurement"),
Stacked Data Column("Data"),
Output Table("Data Stacked")
);
// If you don't care about LSL/USL they could be dropped from update
dt_stack << Update(
With(dt_limits),
Match Columns(:Measurement = :Variable),
Replace Columns in Main Table(None)
);
dt_stack << New Column("Data Minus Target", Numeric, Continuous, Formula(
:Data - :Target
));
Ambos formatos de datos tienen sus ventajas y desventajas, dependiendo de lo que estés haciendo.
Editar:
Esto debería obtener los valores de la propiedad de la columna PERO no se volverá a evaluar (realmente no usaría esto si puedes evitarlo)
Names Default To Here(1);
dt = Open("$SAMPLE_DATA/Semiconductor Capability.jmp");
cont_cols = dt << Get Column Names("Continuous", "String");
cols_created = {};
For Each({cont_col}, cont_cols,
specs = Column(dt, cont_col) << Get Property("Spec Limits");
If(Is Empty(specs), // skip columns without specs
Continue();
);
new_col = Eval(Substitute( // generally I use Eval(EvalExpr()) but in this case this makes expression more clear
Expr(dt << New Column(cont_col || " Minus Target", Numeric, Continuos, Formula(
_curcol_ - (_curcol_ << Get Property("Spec Limits"))["Target"]
))),
Expr(_curcol_), Name Expr(AsColumn(dt, cont_col))
));
//new_col << Suppress Eval(1);
Insert Into(cols_created, new_col << get name);
);