Hi JMP Community,
I have been studying the Nominal Logistic Fit to determine the value of a Baseline Biomarker to predict the outcome of a Clinical Treatment.
I thought that I understood the concept of the Confusion Matrix: it returns the numbers of True Positive, True Negative, False Positive, and False Negative for a given model for the Training data set and, if defined, the Validation set. However, when I compare the Confusion Matrix to the best outcome from the ROC Table (Maximum SENSITIVITY - (1 - SPECIFICITY) value), I struggle to reconcile the two.
For example I have a a model with a ROC AUC = 0.654 (rather weak association) where the Confusion Matrix returns:
| | | Predicted | Predicted |
| | | YES | NO |
| ACTUAL | YES | 1 | 82 |
| ACTUAL | NO | 1 | 278 |
--> which is really bad (actually worst than expected for the ROC AUC value).
For the same model, the ROC Table best combination of SENSITIVITY and SPECIFICITY is:
| Prob | 1-SPEC | SENS | SENS - (1-SPEC) | True Pos | True Neg | False Pos | False Neg |
| 0.2797 | 0.2437 | 0.5060 | 0.2623 | 42 | 211 | 68 | 41 |
--> which is quite bad but more in line with expected outcome of a model with a ROC AUC = 0.654
So, my questions are:
- What is the main difference between Confusion Matrix and the "best" row of the ROC Table?
- Is it because the former use the highest Probability and the latter uses the best SENSITIVITY and SPECIFICITY combination?
- If I were to present these results, what would be the best option to present the Positive Predictive Value and the Negative Predictive Value?
Thank you for your help.
Sincerely,
TS