Fishers Exact Test InterpretationHello! I am analyzing an experiment that I conducted which was made using JMP DOE. I am interested in using the Fishers Exact Test results (pictured below). I was doing some reading on the JMP help site and it says that values in the tables are not to be considered as P-Values, can these values be taken has regular probability values or is there another way to interpret the data.
Basic Data Analysis and ModelingData Exploration and VisualizationDesign of ExperimentsWindowsRe: Fishers Exact Test InterpretationHi @MedianPuppy4982 and @Mark_Bailey : I see where the confusion is coming from.
Here: Fisher’s Exact Test Report (jmp.com)
Therein, it says:
"The Fisher’s Exact Test report includes the following information:
Table Probability (P)
The probability for the observed table. This is not the p-value for the test.
Two-sided Prob ≤ P
The significance probability (p-value) for the two-sided test."
The above is true for the general r x c table case as in my example screenshot below (I have a binary response, and a three level factor) where my table is 3 rows by 2 columns.
But, in the 2 x 2 case (like @MedianPuppy4982 has) it gives p-values only as @MedianPuppy4982 output shows. .
Re: Fishers Exact Test InterpretationThey are p-values. Can you send me a link to the page in the documentation from which you interpreted otherwise?
What is your alternative hypothesis in the experiment? Isi it two-sided or one-sided?
