712116_en-US

liliconcom

F2 BCa confidence limits and differences between the F2 Analysis report and Distribution analysis

Using the script below as an example, the F2 report shows the BCa confidence interval is [50.459, 61.602].  Saving the bootstrap samples to a data table and running distribution analysis on them produces different results, the BCa confidence interval is [50.4786, 61.6594] (see below).  Should these results match?  If not, what am I missing that explains why they are different?

 

dt = open("$Sample_Data/Dissolution DoE.jmp");
this_fc = dt << Fit Curve(
 Data Format( Row ),
 Y( :Dissolution 60, :Dissolution 120, :Dissolution 240, :Dissolution 360 ),
 Group( :Set ),
 F2 Analysis(
  Alpha( 0.1 ),
  Reference Level( "A" ),
  Bootstrap Samples( 2500 ),
  Random Seed( 123456 )
 )
);
this_fc << (Fit[1] << Save Bootstrap Results);
Wait( 0 );
Current Data Table() << Distribution(
 Arrange in Rows( 1 ),
 Continuous Distribution(
  Column( :R F2 ),
  Horizontal Layout( 1 ),
  Vertical( 0 ),
  Process Capability( 0 )
 )
);