Is there a way to capture logs without silencing exceptions?In my test framework I would like to cut out the clutter that results from Prints/Writes/handled exceptions from my output file, so I tried executing test code inside of a Log Capture( Eval( testExpression ) ). My problem is that this seems to also silence any exceptions that get thrown when evaluating the testExpression, which I did not expect.
As an example:
Try(
logs = Log Capture(
Throw( "newsflash buddy!" );
);<BR /> Print( "Logs: " || logs );
,
Print( "Error:" || exception_msg )
);
I would like to get the logs, but still end up in the catch in case the code inside of the Capture throws.
Side-question: my thrown exception doesn't actually appear in the logs, which further confuses me as to why the capture silences it.
Automation and ScriptingRe: Is there a way to capture logs without silencing exceptions?See if this function works for your purpose.

Re: Is there a way to capture logs without silencing exceptions?Hi Mark, the function that you've linked is the one to which I was referring in my original post. The issue that I am having is that exceptions thrown in the expressions inside the capture are suppressed. For instance, in my snippet above, the Print in the catch block does not get executed.
Re: Is there a way to capture logs without silencing exceptions?I don't remember the details, but it was necessary for LogCapture to handle any unresolved throws. It can't rethrow and save the result into logs without your help--something like this:
Try(
logs = Log Capture(
Try(
rememberException = Empty();
Print( "Hello" );
Throw( "newsflash buddy!" );
,
rememberException = exception_msg
)
);
Print( "Logs: " || logs );
If( !Is Empty( rememberException ),
throw( "remember: " || rememberException )
);
,
Print( "Error: " || exception_msg )
);
"Logs:
\!"Hello\!""
"Error: remember: newsflash buddy!"
Re: Is there a way to capture logs without silencing exceptions?I forgot to mention that you can save the result returned by this function for examination. @Craige_Hales' reply shows how you might use this function instead of printing from within any code provided as an argument. I'm sorry for the confusion.
Re: Is there a way to capture logs without silencing exceptions?Thanks Craige, this is perfect!