665502_zh-TW

liliconcom

在循環中使用設置每個值、具有相同列名的表和 col 統計函數的組合時出現錯誤

這已報告給 JMP 支持人員，他們已將其作為錯誤提交給開發 (00049239)。 似乎至少在 JMP16.2 和 JMP17.0 中會發生

 

需要注意的是，在使用上述組合（設置每個值、循環和列統計函數）時，JMP 存在相當嚴重的錯誤。 所發生的情況是，在將數據添加到不同的表時，JMP 確實使用了錯誤表中的數據。 一種解決方法是在 << Set Each Value (<< Set Each Value(Col Rank(Row(), dt:name))) 中提供表首選項。

 

你似乎需要（根據我相當快的測試）：

1. 具有相同列名的數據表
2. 循環那些
3. 使用 << Set Each Value 設置列中的值
4. 使用的公式應使用Col統計函數和byVar（很可能這在兩個表中必須具有相同的名稱）

 

下面是一些測試用例

Names Default To Here(1);
// https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/17.0/#page/jmp/scoping-operators.shtml#

// Initialize data
test_tables = {};
dt = Open("$SAMPLE_DATA/Big Class.jmp");
dt << New Column("REAL NAME RANK", Numeric, Continuous, Formula(Col Rank(Row(), :NAME)));
Column(dt, "age") << Set Modeling Type("Continuous");
Insert Into(test_tables, dt);
dt = Open("$SAMPLE_DATA/Students1.jmp");
dt << Sort(By(:name), Replace Table, Order(Ascending)); // sort to create worse scenario
dt << New Column("REAL NAME RANK", Numeric, Continuous, Formula(Col Rank(Row(), :NAME)));
Column(dt, "age") << Set Modeling Type("Continuous");
Insert Into(test_tables, dt);
/*
dt = Open("$SAMPLE_DATA/Students2.jmp");
dt << Sort(By(:name), Replace Table, Order(Ascending)); // sort to create worse scenario
dt << New Column("REAL NAME RANK", Numeric, Continuous, Formula(Col Rank(Row(), :NAME)));
Column(dt, "age") << Set Modeling Type("Continuous");
Insert Into(test_tables, dt);
*/

// use idx 1 to skip first table
min_idx = 0;

// without reversing we will run out of index as we are using wrong table
// but if we reverse we will get worse outcome (in my opinion) as we end up with wrong data
reverse_tableorder = 0; 


If(reverse_tableorder,
 test_tables = Reverse(test_tables);
);

For Each({dt, idx}, test_tables,
 // works
 // dt << New Column("COPY", Character, Nominal, << Set Each Value(:NAME));
 // dt << New Column("MULTI", Numeric, Continuous, << Set Each Value(:age * :age));

 If(idx > 0, // if the column isn't created to first table seems to work fine?
  // Doesn't work (// old table used due to some col function optimizations when using byVar?)
  Try(
   dt << New Column("RANK", Numeric, Continuous, << Set Each Value(Col Rank(Row(), :NAME)));
  ,
   show(exception_msg);
  );

  Try(
   new_col = dt << New Column("RANK_SEPARATE", Numeric, Continuous);
   new_col << Set Each Value(Col Rank(:Row(), :name));
  ,
   show(exception_msg);
  );

  Try(
   new_col = dt << New Column("SUM", Numeric, Continuous, << Set Each Value(Col Sum(1)));
  ,
   show(exception_msg);
  );

  Try(
   new_col = dt << New Column("SUM_WITH_GROUP", Numeric, Continuous, << Set Each Value(Col Sum(1, :name)));
  ,
   show(exception_msg);
  );

  Try( // with reverse_tableorder = 1, :age is taken from correct table BUT the group sizes from wrong? 
  // KATIE -> 72 (6*12) and not 11+12+12+13+14+15 -> 77
   new_col = dt << New Column("SUM_OF_COL", Numeric, Continuous);
   new_col << Set Each Value(Col Sum(:age, :name));
  ,
   show(exception_msg);
  );

  // workaround
  dt << New Column("RANK_WITH_REF", Numeric, Continuous, << Set Each Value(
   Col Rank(Row(), dt:NAME)
  ));
 );
);

自動化和腳本編寫