Hello Community,
I want to use the capability index plot for my process capability report. Therefore I need to change the shade levels (yellow and green area). The capability line is 1.0 which is still ok. Now I want to change the yellow borderline to 1.33. Is this change possible? I haven't found a possibility to change this line.
JMP version:16.2
Do you have an idea @Jonas_Rinne?
Thanks for your help!

Here is the part of my session script for the report:
Capability Index Plot( 1, Capability Lines( 1 ), Shade Levels( 1 ) ),
Process Performance Plot( 0 ),
Automatic Recalc( 1 ),
SendToReport(
Dispatch(
{"Overall Sigma Capability Summary Report"},
"",
TableBox,
{Sort By Column( 13, 0 )}
),
Dispatch(
{"Capability Index Plot"},
"2",
ScaleBox,
{Min( -0.0316605834674102 ), Max( 3.56546171869086 ), Inc( 1 ),
Minor Ticks( 0 )}
Hi David,
The "Shade Levels" option for the Capability Index Plot automatically shades the levels based on the Ppk slider on the right: Less than the slider value = red; up to 2x the slider value = yellow; more than 2x the slider value is green. This behavior can't be changed, but there's a workaround.
If you uncheck the "Shade Levels," then right-click on the Ppk axis and select Axis Settings..., you can create custom shaded zones to your liking. Example script below:
open ("$SAMPLE_DATA\Cities.jmp");
Process Capability(
Process Variables( :OZONE, :CO, :SO2, :NO ),
Spec Limits(
:OZONE( LSL( 0 ), Target( 0.05 ), USL( 0.1 ) ),
:CO( LSL( 5 ), Target( 10 ), USL( 20 ) ),
:SO2( LSL( 0 ), Target( 0.03 ), USL( 0.08 ) ),
:NO( LSL( 0 ), Target( 0.025 ), USL( 0.6 ) )
),
Moving Range Method( Average of Moving Ranges ),
Capability Box Plots( 0 ),
Goal Plot( 0, Shade Levels( 1 ) ),
Capability Index Plot( 1 ),
Process Performance Plot( 0 ),
SendToReport(
Dispatch(
{"Capability Index Plot"},
"2",
ScaleBox,
{Add Ref Line( {-1, 1}, "Solid", "Red", "", 1, 0.25 ),
Add Ref Line( {1, 1.33}, "Solid", "Yellow", "", 1, 0.25 ),
Add Ref Line( {1.33, 3}, "Solid", "Green", "", 1, 0.25 )}
)
)
);
Thanks for the fast answer and the work around, Jed. 
I checked all the options and did not find a direct solution.
Hi Jed,
thanks a lot for your solution. It was easy for me to implement it 
