Would it be possible to add the Dixon Q test and Grubb's outlier test to JMP?I currently have scripts that will perform both tests, but it would be very convenient if they were built into JMP.
Basic Data Analysis and ModelingRe: Would it be possible to add the Dixon Q test and Grubb's outlier test to JMP? - Status changed to: InvestigatingRe: Would it be possible to add the Dixon Q test and Grubb's outlier test to JMP?That seems like a reasonable platform in which to include the Dixon and Grubbs' tests. This would be very helpful in the pharma world because these two are specifically mentioned in the USP.
Re: Would it be possible to add the Dixon Q test and Grubb's outlier test to JMP? - Status changed to: Needs InfoThank you for the suggestion. Where do you think would be a good place or places to include these outlier tests? Should it be a standalone platform and report, or incorporated into other platforms?
We have a platform, under Analyze > Screening > Explore Outliers that does do some outlier detection methods. Could this be a place for that feature?
Re: Would it be possible to add the Dixon Q test and Grubb's outlier test to JMP?I just wanted to second this. It would be very usefull to have the Grubbs test added to the Outlier plattform (and allow to select the identified outliers - which is not an option in the add-in, sadly).
Re: Would it be possible to add the Dixon Q test and Grubb's outlier test to JMP? - Status changed to: AcknowledgedRe: Would it be possible to add the Dixon Q test and Grubb's outlier test to JMP?A customer currently uses Minitab in their organization's data-processing workflow because these tests weren't unavailable in JMP.
Re: Would it be possible to add the Dixon Q test and Grubb's outlier test to JMP?This is also an issue at my company, we need to direct users to Minitab for these tests, this is in our training materials currently and I would love to be able to change it!
Re: Would it be possible to add the Dixon Q test and Grubb's outlier test to JMP?Do we have plans to update this feature to a new version? One of my pharmaceutical clients has raised the same demand, as mentioned by the person above
