<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />Hi Damien,
Please accept my apologies that you missed my earlier message in the JMP User Community.
I suppose that I (wrongly) assumed that everyone was receiving email from activity in the User Community which is the default behavior.
We do want to keep as much content from the steering committee in the Community as possible as it provides us a way to record and archive discussions for future reference. We (SAS and JMP) have become a large and diverse organization with needs to federate responsibilities. As new people join the Committee or our organization we want to be able to provide them background and a record of previous conversations.
Please check your JMP User Community preferences<> to ensure that you’re receiving email from the Community.
Please let me know if you have any questions or difficulties with the options there.
As to the specific issue with Mia Stephens’ paper, we can add it as an alternate. We’ve already had one speaker decline, so we’re down one alternate. I’ll add Mia in as an additional alternate and if needed we’ll get her paper in the conference.
Again, please accept my apologies that you missed my message.
Jeff Perkinson
JMP Customer Care Manager
SAS Institute Inc.
SAS Campus Drive • Cary, North Carolina 27513 • USA
Ph: 919-531-6521
E-mail: Jeff.Perkinson@jmp.com
Share. Ask. Learn. Connect. - community.jmp.com<>
Connect with me in the JMP User Community<>.
On Nov 19, 2015, at 12:16 PM, PERRET Damien > wrote:
Hello all,
Have you seen this comment below, that Jeff wrote on the jmp.usercommunity website on Nov 9. ?
I am just seeing it.
For the future, I would suggest that when important decisions have to be taken, such as deciding the final set of papers to be accepted, we communicate by emails and/or confcall instead of comments on the jmp.usercommunity website.
Personally I wanted to push the paper from Mia Stephens (Teaching Statistics to Non-Statisticians using Simulations and Resample Methods) but I understand from Jeff’s comment that this is too late.
This is too bad, since this paper was initially in the top 10 with a mean of 3.82… ☹
Best Regards
Damien
Jeff Perkinson<> 9 nov. 2015 21:52<>
Thanks to everyone who was able to join our call a couple of weeks ago.
There were some tough decisions to make but you all did good work.
Here are the papers after some input from us on the papers from SAS. Please comment if you have strong opinions about any of these papers or papers that may not have been chosen. Of course, any paper that was not chosen can only be included by eliminating one of the accepted papers. So, if you make a request, please be sure to suggest which paper it would replace.
Regarding the papers in the Life Sciences/JMP Clinical, chris.wells.cw10<>, we're going to ask Eggbert and Enrikas to cut their talks to 30 minutes. If you think your presentation would make for a more diverse slate of papers in this area, please let me know and we can swap yours for one of theirs.
As for posters, ALL presenters who were not selected will be offered the chance to present a poster.
Finally, we need to finalize this slate as soon as possible. So, please reply here with your assent or dissent by the end of this week.
Thanks,
-Jeff
30 Minute Papers
#
Paper ID
Mean
Standard Deviation
Paper Status
Author
Paper Title
1
103
4.36
0.67
Accept
Stephen Pearson
New insights into process deviations using multivariate control charts
2
118
4.36
0.81
Accept
Elizabeth Claassen
Random Coefficient Models: How to Model Longitudinal and Hierarchical Data in JMP Pro
3
104
4.00
0.89
Accept
Laura Lancaster
An Integrated Process Improvement Approach using JMP’s Second Generation Quality Tools
4
113
3.91
0.83
Accept
Benjamin (Mike) Adams
Are You Familiar with the Expression…..?
5
115
3.91
0.83
Accept
Bertram Schäfer
Hierarchical Response Models for Design of Experiments
6
134
3.91
0.94
Accept
Steffen Brammer
A JMP script for geostatistical cluster analysis of mixed data sets with spatial information
7
139
3.91
1.04
Accept
Christian Ritter
Skeletons and Flying Carpets: A step beyond profiles and contours to explore multiple response surfaces
8
106
3.82
0.87
Accept
Robert Anderson
Robust Optimisation of Processes and Products by using Monte Carlo Simulation Experiments
9
137
3.64
0.81
Accept
Pascal Schäfer
Identification of Effective HIV Interventions When P >> N: A Cross-Country Application of Variable Selection Models and Elastic Net Regression Modeling
10
107
3.64
1.03
Accept
Marion Janker
From laboratory to manufacture: understanding the variability of a granulated product between different scales, production sites and testing facilities using JMP®
11
140
3.64
1.36
Accept
Anne Hasted
Who Likes Green Apples? Applications of Multivariate Analysis and Data Visualisations in Consumer Science
12
114
3.55
0.93
Accept
Jianfeng Ding
Multiple Correspondence Analysis – A New Platform for Categorical Variables, Ready to be Explored!
13
141
3.55
0.93
Accept
Elie Maricau
Development of an Inferential Model for Real Time Quality Monitoring in a Chemical Production Plant
14
117
3.36
0.92
Accept
Yves Gueniffey
How JMP can help determine the type of surface collapse over abandoned mines
15
160
3.27
1.01
Accept
Egbert van der Meulen
A SAS JMP Clinical Template for Central Statistical Monitoring at Ferring Pharmaceuticals
16
159
3.00
1.10
Accept
Enrikas Vainorius, MD
Modern Techniques in Centralized Clinical Trial Monitoring
17
155
3.45
1.04
Alternate 1
Peng Liu
Exploring the BackBlaze Hard Drive Data
18
154
3.55
1.21
Alternate 2
Peter van Bruggen
Is there a Pot of Gold at the end of DoE’s Rainbow, or does that remains Leprechaun’s Secret?
19
131
3.36
0.50
Alternate 3
Ryan Lekivetz
Covering Arrays: A tool to construct efficient test suites for validating deterministic systems
20
142
3.36
1.03
Alternate 4
chris wells
Statistical Monitoring – ‘Its just data cleaning, right?’
21
136
3.09
1.04
Alternate 5
Deepti Varshney
How I made analysis on my blood sugar and could control my blood sugar using this analysis
22
108
3.82
1.17
Alternate 6
Mia Stephens
Teaching Statistics to Non-Statisticians using Simulations and Resample Methods
23
102
3.73
0.65
Alternate 7
Drew Foglia
JMP Clinical 6.0 - New Features for Improved Study Analyses and Sharing
45 Minute Papers
#
Paper ID
Mean
Standard Deviation
Paper Status
Author
Paper Title
1
234
4.64
0.67
Accept
Bradley Jones
Powerful Analysis of Definitive Screening Designs Taking Advantage of their Special Structure
2
224
4.36
0.81
Accept
Silvio Miccio
Modeling Curves/Sprectra with JMP
3
201
4.18
0.75
Accept
Kate Llewellyn
A comparison of model building platforms in JMP and JMP Pro for analysis of custom designs
4
235
4.18
1.08
Accept
Xan Gregg
All Graphs Are Wrong, but Some Are Useful
5
208
3.73
0.65
Accept
Corinne BERGES
Outlier screening in test of automotive semiconductors: use of jmp 12 Pro ‘Multivariate Analysis’ platforms and ‘Explore Outliers’ utility
6
236
3.73
0.79
Accept
Alain GAUTIER
Test Time Reduction and predictive analysis Using Optimized flow based on D-Optimal Design, Principal Component Analysis and Hierarchical Component Analysis.
7
205
3.55
0.82
Accept
Richard Zink
Risk-Based Monitoring and Fraud Detection in Clinical Trials
8
240
3.09
0.94
Accept
Michael Crotty
Using an Augmented Covering Array to Test the New Destructive Degradation Platform
9
218
4.00
1.18
Alternate .
James Wisnowski
Innovative Text Analytics for Surveys and Incident Reports
10
216
3.91
1.14
Alternate .
Drew Foglia
Object Oriented JSL - Techniques for Writing Maintainable/Extendable JSL Code
11
232
3.64
0.92
Alternate .
Roselinde Kessels
Cases studies on designing and analysing discrete choice experiments using JMP
12
230
3.27
1.01
Alternate .
Michael Hecht
Run Program - JMP's Link To Other Programs
Posters
#
Paper ID
Mean
Standard Deviation
Paper Status
Author
Paper Title
1
310
4.50
0.71
Accept
Phil Kay
We have all the time in the world: Use your time wisely in designing experiments.
2
306
4.20
0.79
Accept
James Gilman
Design of Synthetic Gene Switches Using JMP
3
304
4.10
0.74
Accept
Daniel Tray
Maximising the Value of Time Series Data: Repeated Measures Analysis Using JMP
4
305
4.10
0.88
Accept
Frank Deruyck
Modeling % Body Fat in a human body using Design of Experiments and Regression analysis
5
307
4.10
1.10
Accept
Olaf Bürger
Videoexperiment evaluated with JMP
6
303
4.00
0.94
Accept
Davy Van den Bosch
Beating complexity in automated method qualification via Tailored Split-Split-Plot design with JMP® Pro.
7
301
4.00
1.05
Accept
Bernard McKeown
JSL is THE Language of Analytical Communication
8
308
3.90
0.99
Accept
Daniel Marcos
Regression models for an industrial reactive extraction process
9
302
3.50
1.08
Accept
Stephanie Lucas
Surviving the Rain: The Five Step Program for a JMP Novice
• Recommandation <> Afficher 0 « j'aime »(0<>) Répondre
