nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

74723_en-US

liliconcom

Missing value handling for Ordinal x/Factors in Partition

Suggestion: Please treat missing data (and missing value code data) for ordinal X/Factor variables the same as continuous X/Factor variables when the informative missing option is selected. That is, test to see if missing is better grouped "high" or "low". Right now, it appears to be treat the missing value (or missing value code) as an ordinal value and assign it accordingly.

Statistics and Analytics

Re: Missing value handling for Ordinal x/Factors in Partition - Status changed to: In Development

We're working on this for JMP 16.

In the meantime, a way to force ordering is to treat missing in the Value Ordering property.

Column("age")<Re: Missing value handling for Ordinal x/Factors in Partition

Tracking Number is 7612567893

Comments

There are no comments yet