Rankings for Discovery Europe 2016 Papers<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />Note: You will need to view this message in the JMP User Community to download the paper review application.
Executive summary:
- Papers have been ranked based on the ratings submitted by the committee
- Download and install the attached JMP Add-in
- Launch the paper review application from your Add-Ins menu
- Final paper selections will be made during our call on Friday, 30Oct
- We will select sixteen (16) 30-minute papers and eight (8) 45-minute papers, plus alternates in each group
Thanks to all of you for rating the abstracts for the conference. Many of you commented on how many good papers were submitted.
We have aggregated the ratings and ranked the papers by average rating. Papers with the same rating are tied at that rank.
I'm attaching another JMP Add-in here. This one will allow you to see the rankings, average and standard deviation of the rating and comments.
We will use this application during our call to make the final selections. In the meantime you can review the rankings and prepare yourself to advocate for the papers you think should be selected.
In the application, I have marked the top three papers in each category and the top three posters accepted. This was arbitrary.
During our call on Friday, we will need to select sixteen (16) 30-minute papers and eight (8) 45-minute papers, plus alternates in each group.
For the poster selection, unless there is objection to a specific poster we will offer poster presentation slots to all the poster abstracts. We will offer poster slots to any abstract author who's paper is not selected.
I'll look forward to the call on Friday, 30Oct, 1:00 PM. Please find the Webex details in your calendar invitation. It will be helpful for you to view the Webex presentation as we make our selections.
Thanks again.
Re: Rankings for Discovery Europe 2016 PapersThanks to everyone who was able to join our call a couple of weeks ago.
There were some tough decisions to make but you all did good work.
Here are the papers after some input from us on the papers from SAS. Please comment if you have strong opinions about any of these papers or papers that may not have been chosen. Of course, any paper that was not chosen can only be included by eliminating one of the accepted papers. So, if you make a request, please be sure to suggest which paper it would replace.
Regarding the papers in the Life Sciences/JMP Clinical, chris.wells.cw10 , we're going to ask Eggbert and Enrikas to cut their talks to 30 minutes. If you think your presentation would make for a more diverse slate of papers in this area, please let me know and we can swap yours for one of theirs.
As for posters, ALL presenters who were not selected will be offered the chance to present a poster.
Finally, we need to finalize this slate as soon as possible. So, please reply here with your assent or dissent by the end of this week.
Thanks,
-Jeff
30 Minute Papers
# | Paper ID | Mean | Standard Deviation | Paper Status | Author | Paper Title |
1 | 103 | 4.36 | 0.67 | Accept | Stephen Pearson | New insights into process deviations using multivariate control charts |
2 | 118 | 4.36 | 0.81 | Accept | Elizabeth Claassen | Random Coefficient Models: How to Model Longitudinal and Hierarchical Data in JMP Pro |
3 | 104 | 4.00 | 0.89 | Accept | Laura Lancaster | An Integrated Process Improvement Approach using JMP’s Second Generation Quality Tools |
4 | 113 | 3.91 | 0.83 | Accept | Benjamin (Mike) Adams | Are You Familiar with the Expression…..? |
5 | 115 | 3.91 | 0.83 | Accept | Bertram Schäfer | Hierarchical Response Models for Design of Experiments |
6 | 134 | 3.91 | 0.94 | Accept | Steffen Brammer | A JMP script for geostatistical cluster analysis of mixed data sets with spatial information |
7 | 139 | 3.91 | 1.04 | Accept | Christian Ritter | Skeletons and Flying Carpets: A step beyond profiles and contours to explore multiple response surfaces |
8 | 106 | 3.82 | 0.87 | Accept | Robert Anderson | Robust Optimisation of Processes and Products by using Monte Carlo Simulation Experiments |
9 | 137 | 3.64 | 0.81 | Accept | Pascal Schäfer | Identification of Effective HIV Interventions When P >> N: A Cross-Country Application of Variable Selection Models and Elastic Net Regression Modeling |
10 | 107 | 3.64 | 1.03 | Accept | Marion Janker | From laboratory to manufacture: understanding the variability of a granulated product between different scales, production sites and testing facilities using JMP® |
11 | 140 | 3.64 | 1.36 | Accept | Anne Hasted | Who Likes Green Apples? Applications of Multivariate Analysis and Data Visualisations in Consumer Science |
12 | 114 | 3.55 | 0.93 | Accept | Jianfeng Ding | Multiple Correspondence Analysis – A New Platform for Categorical Variables, Ready to be Explored! |
13 | 141 | 3.55 | 0.93 | Accept | Elie Maricau | Development of an Inferential Model for Real Time Quality Monitoring in a Chemical Production Plant |
14 | 117 | 3.36 | 0.92 | Accept | Yves Gueniffey | How JMP can help determine the type of surface collapse over abandoned mines |
15 | 160 | 3.27 | 1.01 | Accept | Egbert van der Meulen | A SAS JMP Clinical Template for Central Statistical Monitoring at Ferring Pharmaceuticals |
16 | 159 | 3.00 | 1.10 | Accept | Enrikas Vainorius, MD | Modern Techniques in Centralized Clinical Trial Monitoring |
17 | 155 | 3.45 | 1.04 | Alternate 1 | Peng Liu | Exploring the BackBlaze Hard Drive Data |
18 | 154 | 3.55 | 1.21 | Alternate 2 | Peter van Bruggen | Is there a Pot of Gold at the end of DoE’s Rainbow, or does that remains Leprechaun’s Secret? |
19 | 131 | 3.36 | 0.50 | Alternate 3 | Ryan Lekivetz | Covering Arrays: A tool to construct efficient test suites for validating deterministic systems |
20 | 142 | 3.36 | 1.03 | Alternate 4 | chris wells | Statistical Monitoring – ‘Its just data cleaning, right?’ |
21 | 136 | 3.09 | 1.04 | Alternate 5 | Deepti Varshney | How I made analysis on my blood sugar and could control my blood sugar using this analysis |
22 | 108 | 3.82 | 1.17 | Alternate 6 | Mia Stephens | Teaching Statistics to Non-Statisticians using Simulations and Resample Methods |
23 | 102 | 3.73 | 0.65 | Alternate 7 | Drew Foglia | JMP Clinical 6.0 - New Features for Improved Study Analyses and Sharing |
45 Minute Papers
# | Paper ID | Mean | Standard Deviation | Paper Status | Author | Paper Title |
1 | 234 | 4.64 | 0.67 | Accept | Bradley Jones | Powerful Analysis of Definitive Screening Designs Taking Advantage of their Special Structure |
2 | 224 | 4.36 | 0.81 | Accept | Silvio Miccio | Modeling Curves/Sprectra with JMP |
3 | 201 | 4.18 | 0.75 | Accept | Kate Llewellyn | A comparison of model building platforms in JMP and JMP Pro for analysis of custom designs |
4 | 235 | 4.18 | 1.08 | Accept | Xan Gregg | All Graphs Are Wrong, but Some Are Useful |
5 | 208 | 3.73 | 0.65 | Accept | Corinne BERGES | Outlier screening in test of automotive semiconductors: use of jmp 12 Pro ‘Multivariate Analysis’ platforms and ‘Explore Outliers’ utility |
6 | 236 | 3.73 | 0.79 | Accept | Alain GAUTIER | Test Time Reduction and predictive analysis Using Optimized flow based on D-Optimal Design, Principal Component Analysis and Hierarchical Component Analysis. |
7 | 205 | 3.55 | 0.82 | Accept | Richard Zink | Risk-Based Monitoring and Fraud Detection in Clinical Trials |
8 | 240 | 3.09 | 0.94 | Accept | Michael Crotty | Using an Augmented Covering Array to Test the New Destructive Degradation Platform |
9 | 218 | 4.00 | 1.18 | Alternate . | James Wisnowski | Innovative Text Analytics for Surveys and Incident Reports |
10 | 216 | 3.91 | 1.14 | Alternate . | Drew Foglia | Object Oriented JSL - Techniques for Writing Maintainable/Extendable JSL Code |
11 | 232 | 3.64 | 0.92 | Alternate . | Roselinde Kessels | Cases studies on designing and analysing discrete choice experiments using JMP |
12 | 230 | 3.27 | 1.01 | Alternate . | Michael Hecht | Run Program - JMP's Link To Other Programs |
Posters
# | Paper ID | Mean | Standard Deviation | Paper Status | Author | Paper Title |
1 | 310 | 4.50 | 0.71 | Accept | Phil Kay | We have all the time in the world: Use your time wisely in designing experiments. |
2 | 306 | 4.20 | 0.79 | Accept | James Gilman | Design of Synthetic Gene Switches Using JMP |
3 | 304 | 4.10 | 0.74 | Accept | Daniel Tray | Maximising the Value of Time Series Data: Repeated Measures Analysis Using JMP |
4 | 305 | 4.10 | 0.88 | Accept | Frank Deruyck | Modeling % Body Fat in a human body using Design of Experiments and Regression analysis |
5 | 307 | 4.10 | 1.10 | Accept | Olaf Bürger | Videoexperiment evaluated with JMP |
6 | 303 | 4.00 | 0.94 | Accept | Davy Van den Bosch | Beating complexity in automated method qualification via Tailored Split-Split-Plot design with JMP® Pro. |
7 | 301 | 4.00 | 1.05 | Accept | Bernard McKeown | JSL is THE Language of Analytical Communication |
8 | 308 | 3.90 | 0.99 | Accept | Daniel Marcos | Regression models for an industrial reactive extraction process |
9 | 302 | 3.50 | 1.08 | Accept | Stephanie Lucas | Surviving the Rain: The Five Step Program for a JMP Novice |
