This is a place to log areas in JMP that:
- Do the same thing, but are called different things in the product.
- Exhibit a variation in workflow across platforms.
- Do different things, but are called the same thing in the product (more rare).
- Cause slow downs in workflow due to expected behavior elsewhere in the product.
Please add to this document with the date, JMP version and name, plus screenshots. After this gets to a critical length, it can be offloaded to the defects system or JMP wiki.
2016-03-23 From Academic Team -- JMP 12 (Mia et al.)
Cross-posted from https://community.jmp.com/docs/DOC-9755. (Protected).
Inconsistencies/improvements:
- RASE and RMSE
- Having two terms is confusing. RASE is only reported in Least Squares (for validation) and Model Comparison, otherwise its reported as RMSE. RASE is just root SSE/n - the biased estimator of RMSE - in most data mining literature it is simply referred to as RMSE. Whatever we do, we need to be consistent.
- Fit and Summary statistics for the different predictive modeling platforms are different:
- For example, for continuous responses (when there is validation):
- Fit model - RSquare and RASE
- Gen Reg - Generalized RSquare, -LogLikelihood, BIC, AIC (and RMSE is reported as Scale in the parameter estimates table)
- Partition - RSquare, RMSE, AICc
- Neural - RSquare, RMSE, MAD, -LogLikelihood, SSE
- Model Comparison - RASE, RSquare, AAE.
- Add MAPE in Model Comparison for continuous response (mean absolute percent error) - this is available in Time Series, but that's the only platform.
- Residual plots in Fit Y by X and Fit Model
- People like the variety of the residual plots in Fit Y by X, but it would be nice if they were prettier (like in the new Mixed platform)
- Fit Model, with SLR, it would be nice if the regression plot has more functionality - confidence bands fit and prediction with the ability to shade
- The option to save prediction or probability formulas - what the option is called, and where its found, is based on the platform. It would be nice if we had more consistency here
- Naming of saved prediction and probability formulas
- Grouping by saved model, with the ability to name the group
- Take advantage of virtual join for scoring with new data? (Via Model Depot)
===================================================
Several opinions in the Wish list thread: https://community.jmp.com/docs/DOC-6989#comment-5696
wish JMP default color schemes to be the same between Graph Builder and other JMP platforms. Right now, they are different, which can cause confusing inconsistencies when presenting data.
================
Hi Dan,
very brilliant idea!
In JMP there are very many functions that affect rows. In different places you have different functions available in the context menue (right mouse click). This is a good thing. But there is no place where all row functions are available. From my oppinion this place should be the Row menu in the data table window.
We have hover help for some statistics and not for some others. we should decide wehter or not we want to have it. Then do the same for every statistic.
