nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

82245_en-US

liliconcom

Stepwise/Best-Subset Descriptive Statistics Different than Least Squares

I'm encountering a problem where I find a good model using the Stepwise Regression Control utility, but then when I "Run Model", the same model shows completely different descriptive statistics. Please help!

Re: Stepwise/Best-Subset Descriptive Statistics Different than Least Squares

Hello,

I think it might be a result of where the missing values are located in your data table. In the Stepwise report, it says that 8 rows were not used due to missing values. But, if those missing values are located in cells in either the "Fill Jobs" or "IQA In-Process" columns, the corresponding rows could still be used in the Fit Model that appears on the left of your screenshot.

Regards,
Michael

Comments

There are no comments yet